(5) hat the child was brought within the jurisdiction of the court under subdivision (e) because of the conduct of that parent. when the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence. "(b) Reunification services need not be provided to a parent. Section 361.5, subdivision (b)(5) and (6) provide as relevant: Statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code. C.T.'s mother, Alicia (mother), also filed a writ petition, which is pending before this court. Father contends the juvenile court's admission of a computerized voice stress analysis deprived him of a fair hearing and due process of law. (b)(5) & (6)) and setting a section 366.26 hearing as to his now 11-month-old son, C.T. (father) seeks extraordinary writ review of the juvenile court's orders issued at a contested dispositional hearing denying him reunification services (Welf. Doering, County Counsel, and Maria Elena Ratliff, Deputy County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest.īefore Levy, Acting P.J., Gomes, J. THE COURT ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS petition for extraordinary writ review. This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |